If you have been accused of committing a crime, you should consider hiring a criminal lawyer. No matter how severe or minor your charges may be having an experienced attorney to fight for you is a necessity. Facing a charge of any kind is always a serious matter, and it should be treated as such. Many attorneys in this field of the law provide free consultations, so you should be able to speak with a professional to get a better idea about your defense before facing the judge.
When you’re faced with a charge, it is important to you enlist an attorney to provide you the representation that you need. Whether you were arrested recently, or you have been charged with a crime, it is natural to feel confused and alone. An experienced attorney will work hard to protect your rights and provide you with guidance through the ordeal. From state traffic violations to federal offenses, it is essential that you get the legal guidance that you need during this difficult time. A criminal lawyer works to represent people who have been accused of committing a crime. Depending on the type of charge you are facing, you may want to hire an attorney who focuses on a specific area of the law. For instance, if you were arrested for drunk driving, you may want to schedule a consultation with a DUI attorney. If are facing drug related charges, an attorney who specializes in drug crimes can help you. Some professionals help clients who have been accused of breaking state laws, while other concentrate solely on federal law. Before you schedule a consultation at any firm, you should determine the kind of attorney you need. Do your research to find the right attorney for your case. Determine what qualities are important to you. You will most likely want a professional with lots of experience in your specific area, a successful track record, and someone who is easy to communicate with. When you sit down with attorneys for consultations, you should ask them about their success with past cases and inquire about the specifics of past cases handled. Ask if he or she is a part of any associations or organizations, and ask about their educational background.
You can find a criminal lawyer through a referral from friends or family members, through online directories, or through professional organizations. Always meet the attorney through a consultation and discuss the details of your case and get an idea of the fees that will be charged before hiring anyone.
In legal trouble? This Flint criminal lawyer will protect your rights: .
By definition, a law firm is a business entity formed by lawyers to advise and represent clients in matters of the law. When it comes to law firms, Liverpool has its fair share of both good and bad ones. Liverpool law firms, along with others are having as tough a time as many other businesses these days. Being a law firm, Liverpool, or anywhere else does not guarantee that the business will be successful, although to be honest they have a better chance of lasting longer, since their services are always needed.
I know of one Liverpool law firm that is closing down because there is not enough business to sustain it. A law firm can be of various sizes, starting with a sole proprietorship, where there is just one lawyer who is responsible for all the assets and liabilities. Then there are the other types of law practices such as a general partnership, where all of the partners are jointly responsible for everything. There are also limited liability companies, limited partnerships, professional corporations and professional associations. All of these different types of law firms have their own set of rules and regulations which need to be followed.
A law firm, Liverpool, and elsewhere, may specialise in the various aspects of the legal system, but the most common area which is of concern to the general public is the area of family law. Family law is a very broad term used to describe the kind of things that most people will need to consult a lawyer about at some point or other in their lives. The kind of things which are included under this term of family are, matters related to property buying, selling and renting for commercial or residential purposes, divorce and legal separation, custody issues, and wills and probates.
Apart from family law, Liverpool law firms also deal with criminal cases, bankruptcy, and immigration matters. There is a lot of business around as people need legal advice everyday, but because there is now so much competition around, these firms are struggling to get new clients. With so much choice these days, people can afford to look around and get quotes for the advice they need, and then compare these quotes to get the best price that is suitable for them. Not everyone can afford a good lawyer and this is why it is important to ask around for recommendations.
Liverpool law firms, along with those throughout the country, depend on having a good reputation to build their business. This is why it is essential for each firm to provide the best customer care, while still providing quality advice at reasonable prices. A lot of the business that law firms get is through personal recommendations, especially when it concerns family law. No matter what the size of the law firm is, the important thing to remember is that customer satisfaction should be a priority, especially since law firms already have an image of being cold and greedy on the whole.
Stefan Seuss is a leading business consultant in the State of Florida. He has incorporated his consulting activities through his company called Seuss and Partners L.L.C in South Florida. He offers his clients a variety of financial services by setting up the foreign bank accounts in order to shield their investments and monetary fund around the world. His firm operates well from the locations in Miami, Florida, as well as from Frankfurt, Germany, Sao Paulo, Brazil, Zurich, Switzerland, and Salzburg, Austria. All their clients funds are then properly invested in Insurance Settlements.
Stefan Seuss has gained knowledge and experience in the fields of International taxation law, International Corporate law, International transactions, International business law, and Family Office services. He has made so many achievements including the offering of settlements of the insurance policy like selling an unneeded policy to a third party for more than its cash value and less than its face value. Apart from serving Florida, he has also extended his services in the United States by providing the business solutions, investment options and other financial services. He has attracted lot many clients behind him by handling their wealth and assets in a great manner. As a money and asset wealth consultant, he has attained a big name in the field of Finance.
Stefan Seuss, a German National has become the managing partner of Seuss and Partners only by his true dedication towards his work. He has got the special talent of knowing how to get the work done by others. He has been offered this highest position in this firm, because he is dedicated to this firm in terms of duties and responsibilities. He has obtained a long list of clients for his recognized talent in the areas of International taxation law, International Corporate law, International transactions, International business law, and Family Office services.
Stefan Seuss has got the wide knowledge about the International taxation law and he determines the tax on a person or business subject to the tax laws of different countries. He has brought up the firm so well to reach the dazzling heights with the help of an international team of highly qualified experts. Stefan Seuss provides the state-of-the art support and advice to his international clients around the world throughout the day and throughout the week. He is well versed in handling the clients wealth and assets for the offshore company and for the foreign bank accounts. He is well qualified in the field of global taxation and asset management.
Have you ever heard of a local rule of court that required you as an attorney to present your case entirely by declarations at time of trial including establishing the admissibility of all the exhibits which you wish to have entered into evidence? How difficult and more time consuming is that than presenting oral evidence?
How difficult for an attorney? How much more difficult for a husband representing himself in a dissolution case while wife is represented by counsel? This was the local rule in Contra Costa County.
Now comes Mr. Elkins who is self-represented. His pretrial declaration fails to establish the evidentiary foundation for all but 2 of his 36 exhibits. Because he didnt lay a proper foundation as he was required to do in his declarations, 34 of his exhibits are excluded. So guess who had the marital property divided the way that spouse wanted it? Mr. Elkins was substantially deprived of his right to be heard by the local rule in Contra Costa County. So Mr. Elkins appealed and his case went up to the California Supreme Court.
In 2007, the California Supreme Court in the case called Elkins v. Superior Court (2007) 41 Cal 45h 1337, found that the local rule conflicted with existing statutory law and deprived litigants of meaningful access to the courts, and that marital dissolution trials should proceed under the same general rules of procedure that govern other civil trials.
The California Supreme Court also recognized that family courts, among the busiest in the state are underresourced , have few bench officers per the number of litigants per capita than in other areas of the legal system and that the ever growing number of self-represented litigants is presenting what was termed unique challenges to the courts ability to provide meaningful access to justice.
The Supreme court emphasized that if trial courts do not have adequate resources for family law cases, they should seek additional resources instead of putting efficiency ahead of fairness. The court noted that in trying to streamline the litigation process in family law, litigants should not be subjected to second-class status or deprived of access to justice. In other words, the Supremes held that family law litigants should have the same due process protections of adversary trials concluding using the established rules of evidence as litigants in other types of civil cases.
Main advantage of divorce peacemakers are, they allows couples to share mutual information to be shared among the professionals and clients alike and also they allows for questions to be asked and answers to be given from both side. It keeps litigation and the financial and emotional wastefulness associated with litigation at abeyance.
Mediated divorce is an great court room alternative to traditional litigation and also it is faster and less expensive than retaining litigation attorneys helps you in this process of beginning your life again after divorce.
Have you designed something by yourself that nobody else has succeeded in discovering so far? You might be in a hurry to take it to the companies, sell it and make profit from it, right? But, that is probably not the very best thing to do. Just like your physical property, your intellectual property can also be stolen or misused by your rivals for their benefits. So, before you get the required recognition for your discovery, you must make sure that it is safe. And for this, the only possible way of securing it is to get a patent. If you live in Arizona, you can hire a patent law Arizona firm to help you with this process.
Why do you need a patent?
If a person comes up with an invention that has no prior historical precedents, then he or she should claim a patent for his invention. The United States of America has this rule that to make sure that ones invention is exclusive and the others are deprived of the opportunity to claim fame for that invention, a patent is important. If you have a patent for your product, then nobody else can use it, or try to make it or sell it and even claim that he or she has invented that product.
What are the factors that would be covered under this patent act?
One can practically patent anything through a patent law Scottsdale. Whether it is an academic discovery or something as serious as genetic science and medicine, or even something that is related to business, it doesnt matter. It will give him full protection from being stolen or even being used by others. Every intellectual property can be patented and should be patented, but that should be done through a good law firm.
Which companies are bests in this?
If one is looking for a patent attorney Arizona, he should look for serious law firms who have been dealing with patents and have the experience to deal with these. Even it is also very important that he chooses a law firm who has acquired millions of dollars from established corporations to the investors and also withstood the challenges of court.
It is always advisable that you do not choose the non-lawyer agents for this task. Only a skilled and licensed patent law Arizona firm can do this task efficiently, in case you live in Arizona.
Have you been a citizen of California trying to find a competent divorce lawyer to situation inside a divorce, custody of the children, and alimony or property separation case? Take a look at orange county California bar association lawyer referral service. In addition to personally interviewing a variety of lawyers, referral services work best method to obtain professional and experienced divorce lawyers in Orange County./p>
Since orange county comes second one of the most populous counties in California, it is certain of getting one of several many divorce attorneys which will satisfy your legal needs and get a mutual solution. It is important is to run through legal counsel referral service with a reputation. While many services only will find you an attorney, others will guarantee you find a legal professional who matches your case.
Fortunately, there are different referral services in Orange County which are reliable. These include
1. 1. Online referral services
2. 2. Public referral services
3. 3. Private referral services
Each one of these referral services differ in cost, the quantity of information given about lawyers, number of lawyers, lawyer qualification to enter the service, etc. should you be discovering it nearly impossible to find a great lawyer from these sources, there’s a myriad other referral services that will be of proper help. An example may be the Legal Aid Society of Orange County which supplies services to low income earners and elderly people.
Advantages of choosing a legal professional referral service in Oc
Many individuals facing emotional life events of their families prefer using referral services to discover good divorce lawyers to be effective on their cases due to advantages the service offers. Some of the advantages are
– Offer an opportunity to make use of a divorce lawyer who may have been pre-screened for his or her experience and expertise
– There’s a plethora of trained and multilingual attorneys who provide a listening ear without notice to speak
– Feel comfortable knowing that the lawyer features a malpractice insurance
– Get the opportunity to think about reviews of a lawyer’s performance and just what former clients say
– It is certain that whichever lawyer you select features a good standing together with the California state bar and also American bar association
– The rate of initial consultation is usually reduced in referral services, many are even offered free of charge
– Obtain a second, third or perhaps fourth opinion about your case
Perusing a referral service saves time. For instance, you simply mention your case once.
– High a higher level confidentiality especially if you include the kind that doesn’t want people to understand is happening with you and your family
Cases which entail family members like a unit usually make you go through trying and emotional moments. In the event the case isn’t handled well, it may lead stress, depression or perhaps suicide. The achievements of the case starts from the original steps of choosing a family group law lawyer. There is no better strategy to make a knowledgeable decision about which family lawyer to utilize other than a lawyer referral service in Oc.
See Attorney Julian Fox> at the State Bar of California site at http://members.calbar.ca.gov/fal/Member/Detail/144716.
According to experts, humans, their attitudes and perceptions in life are all a result of a social construct. This social construct dictates how they should act, who they can become, and what their role in the society is. This is far different from the concept of human being as created and intended by God. So, what is the difference between these two? And what impact does it make to one’s life?
The law generally categorizes persons into two categories: the natural and artificial person. Thus, it is believed that the government is the one behind all these categorization and the roles that correspond to each category of persons.
The definition for a natural-person is human being capable of fighting for their rights and duties in society. It is the ability to enjoy rights and duties for an individual that is the main concern here, but it is not really an obligation to fulfill rights and duties. This concept is still a product of man’s view on what human-being is, but is still more closely associated with the product of God’s creation.
The concept of an artificial-person is one that is defined by government and law. A human being is looked at as a legal entity instead of a natural human being. As a person of law, she or he has attached legal rights and duties that include a body corporate. There are several other subtle re-definitions to the terms used to identify human being as an artificial-person and it is the government that actually controls the meaning, as well as what its influences are in the society.
Different Types of Artificial-Person
There are several different types identified by the government for artifiicial-person, which includes the following:
Thus, you will encounter most of these terms when reading the Law or Statute and they all refer to the same thing, which is the artificial-person or the societal perspective of what is human being.
For instance, when an individual is employed by his or her employer, that person automatically enters into a Master/Slave contract. Thus, the government, employer, or the master, gains control of a person according to its will. The concept of government is even believed to be formulated such that human rights are violated or taken advantage of, enabling the government to own whatever the citizen produces for the society. It is also in this same concept that the idea of paying for taxes came about, specificially referred to by the term tax return.
There are a lot more implications on the society that is delivered by this categorization of human-beings (those created by God) into natural-person and artificial-person. These definitions are expected to change as society and Government laws change as well.
Company law is full of confusing terms, and if you don’t know what they mean then settung up a company can start to look far more scary than it really should be. Read through this jargon buster and you should find it much easier to understand what starting up is all about.
Capital. This is money that is going to be invested in a business. Example: ‘I am starting my business with $5,000 capital, $2,000 of which is my own’.
Contract. When you sign a legal document, you are entering into a contract. Starting a business lets you sign and enter into contracts on behalf of the business — the contract will be between the other person and your company, not you.
Director. The people ultimately in charge of a company are its directors. For a large company, there will be a boards of directors, appointed by the shareholders. For a home business, though, you can appoint yourself as the sole director since you are also the sole shareholder (see ‘shareholder’).
Incorporation. This is the formal name for the process of starting a company. Example: ‘My business was incorporated in March 2000′.
Insolvency. When a company cannot afford to pay its debts. The type of company you have set up will affect what happens in this situation — you may be liable for all of the debt yourself, or for none.
Limited liability. A limited liability company is one where you agree beforehand how much responsibility you will take if anything goes wrong. This protects you from being destroyed financially if something bad happens to your business.
Office. Your company’s ‘office’ isn’t just a place with computers — it’s also a legal concept, meaning where your company is based. Your company must have a registered office, which means that you can’t start a company unless you have an address which would be legal to use for this purpose.
Private. A home business will be private, which means that members of the public cannot invest by buying shares. This does not stop individuals from buying percentages of your company if you are willing to sell, though. Starting your company as a private one also doesn’t stop you from converting it to a public one later on.
Proxy. Someone who acts as a proxy for you acts on your behalf — you have given them the legal right to speak for you. For example, if you get a lawyer to handle the incorporation of your company, they will be incorporating it for you by proxy.
Shareholders. The shareholders are the people who own the company. In your company, you will be the only shareholder (and so own 100% of your business), unless you’ve made a deal with someone else for them to own a share.
When you’re dealing with law, the amount of Latin involved can be confusing. Here are some Latin terms you might come across when you’re setting up your company.
Bona fide: ‘in good faith’. This is used to mean that someone says they are telling the truth.
De facto: ‘in fact’. Used when something has happened that makes the ‘real’ situation take precedence from the legal one.
De jure: ‘in law’. The opposite of de facto.
Ex gratia, ‘out of grace’. When something will be done for no fee.
Prima facie, ‘at first sight’. Something that seems true but is wrong.
Quid pro quo, ‘something for something’. When a fee will be charged for a service (or services will be exchanged).
Be Careful with Jargon.
However much jargon you might begin to encounter as you start your business, don’t start to use it yourself. It will make it so that only ‘insiders’ will understand what you mean, and everyone else will feel either a little silly or a little annoyed. By the same token, if you’re speaking to someone (your accountant, for example) and they use some jargon you don’t understand, there’s nothing wrong with asking them to explain what they mean — it’s their fault for using an overly technical word, not yours for not knowing it.
If you’re not sure, there’s a simple rule: jargon is for communicating very specific, technical meanings. It shouldn’t be used to replace everyday language, as it does nothing but cause confusion.
If your credit is bad and you need to boost your scores quickly your mind may have wondered down the wrong path and made you think what is the quickest way to erase bad credit illegally. While it is possible to illegally remove bad credit it should be avoided!
How Illegal Credit Repair Works
Generally the most common way that people erase negative credit from their reports by breaking the law is to create a new credit profile.This is done by applying for a EIN or TIN number from the United States Federal Government. These numbers are normally reserved for employers or people legally in the USA temporarily.
If you apply for one of these numbers you can effectively use it to start a new credit profile that is fresh and clean.However this has been going on a long time and electronic measures have been put into play by the major credit bureaus and they will eventually uncover what you are doing.
If you are discovered it is a real possibility that you could be charged with a felony if you are not using the EIN or TIN numbers for their intended purposes.
Why Not Clean Up Your credit Legally Instead
If you have bad credit and want to clean it up you have the legal right to dispute any of the information that is showing on our credit report. Even if this negative information is factual you can still dispute it and under the rule of law the account issuer has to prove you wrong and not the other way around.
At no time in our modern history have more demands been placed upon the law enforcement officer. Communities are extremely concerned about crime and they are demanding that law enforcement agencies “do something about it.”
It seems that every day, violent crime and drugs occupy the front page of every newspaper in America.
Politicians at the local, state and national level like to give the impression of being “tough on crime” and espouse philosophies which, at least outwardly, seem to support that toughness.
At the same time, the public (via the media) is scrutinizing the actions of the law enforcement community more closely than ever before.
The public wants results and, more importantly, to feel safe. Yet, that same public will not tolerate any perceived abuses of suspects’ rights in the process.
Primarily due to the increased cost of incarceration, a concerted push is being made to release prisoners from jails and prisons, with the ensuing increase in probationers and parolees.
Probation/Parole Officers have increased caseloads with no end in sight. Juvenile crime is sky-rocketing. Younger, more fearless criminals are becoming the norm, with the media bringing sad tale after tale into our homes on a nightly basis.
When I speak to new recruits, I tell them that what the public wants in a police officer is simple: we want applicants that are warm, caring individuals who are capable of speaking to public groups; conducting demonstrations at schools; counseling troubled youth; rendering first aid; interacting with and assessing problems from a community perspective.
In addition to all of those admirable qualities, we want much more. If a bad guy is trying to get into our home, we want an absolutely fearless gladiator who will willingly risk his/her very life to apprehend the suspect (without injury to the burglar, of course) and protect our property. We want, expect and demand all of this for a salary that is far less than society pays a plumber!
Whether a person is a Probation/Parole Officer supervising 100 felons, a Police Officer in a patrol car, a Fish and Wildlife Officer working all alone 50 miles from any back-up, a military law enforcement officer or a Federal Agent working in a structured environment, being a law enforcement officer is an extraordinarily tough and complex job which demands that we apply all of our skills and training.
How has the law enforcement community dealt with the ever-increasingly need for interview training? Poorly, I’m afraid. Here’s how it works…
In virtually every modern law enforcement agency, much care and consideration is given to the allocation of training, especially that training which requires both expenditures of time and money. Traditionally, different segments of the agency (patrol, detectives, administration, etc.) have had to compete in a sense for their share of the almighty training dollar budget.
As a result, it is incumbent upon agency administrators to prioritize the available training money. Training in most modern law enforcement agencies has taken on the semblance of a triage system at an emergency room. Administrators want to send everyone to training, so they end up throwing some money at those who are “bleeding” the most.
Due to civil liability concerns, patrol officers mainly receive training emphasizing the motor skills areas (firearms, arrest techniques, emergency driving tactics, handgun retention skills, etc.), said areas presenting the most opportunity for misapplication and a resultant lawsuit.
Investigators receive training geared toward their primary areas of emphasis (interview & interrogation, crime scene investigation, investigative specialties, etc.). Ironically, an objective analysis of the component parts of the job of patrol officer reveals interviewing skills are utilized far more often than any other skill.
Think about it, what skill is used more often than the ability to talk with people and elicit information? Conversely, what will get an officer in trouble with the public faster than an inability to communicate?
How many times in any officer’s life will he or she use deadly force? How many times in any given month will he or she get into a vehicular pursuit? How many instances of dealing with hazardous materials will crop up in an average month?
Contrast the frequency of these incidents against the absolute certainty that we will have to interact with people during each and every shift. We routinely qualify in shooting, attend yearly hazardous materials safety courses, attend Emergency Vehicle Operations courses and the like, yet most patrol officers never attend formal interview and interrogation instruction after an initial exposure to it in the basic training academy.
Consider the following sober statistics:
Police Training academies in the United States offer, on average, only 4 hours of training on interviewing techniques during Basic Training.
60% of law enforcement training academies in the U.S. don’t offer any interview training at all during Basic Training.
Less than 20% of all law enforcement officers have received in-service training in interviewing techniques.
Unfortunately, in most law enforcement agencies, the investigators are repeatedly sent to interview and interrogation training, while the patrol officers who apply to attend are routinely turned down.
In the bureaucratic effort to make training dollars stretch a long way, administrators often prioritize training requests, sometimes based upon outdated or inaccurate information.
I have personally taught classes year after year where the same people (investigators) are in attendance taking the same training while other members of their agencies never get to go! The reason? Someone in authority determined that investigators are the only ones that need the training, so they send them to the same thing year after year.
It is largely for this reason that I developed the Focused Interviewing system in written format, to allow the inexpensive, easy methods contained herein to benefit police officers without regard to job assignment, all in an affordable manner.
Compounding the training problem is the current countrywide push toward “Community Policing” and all of the responsibilities inherent with that system.
Simply put, Community Policing can be best described as a philosophy of empowerment that allows the beat officer to solve problems. By a collaborative effort with others in the community, police officers are responsible for actually resolving the community concerns, rather than just taking enforcement action.
While the philosophy sounds good, the average law enforcement patrol officer has not been given the tools with which to conduct investigations, interview people, make public presentations and achieve this collaboration to solve problems.
Federal grant money has been spread across the country in an effort to promote Community Policing. Officers have been hired, equipment has been purchased and public relations efforts have been extensive in this area.
Unfortunately, officers that do not have the foundation of investigative training may find themselves in an uncomfortable position.
One Community Policing officer recently told me “If I had wanted to interview neighbors, show photo lineups, speak to public groups and work extensively with other public agencies, I would have been a detective. What happened to good, old-fashioned police work?”
One of the primary components of Community Policing is the ability to interact with people in a non-threatening manner which elicits maximum information.
It is an exceptionally good idea for a Field Training Officer to share interviewing techniques with a trainee. Most basic training academies teach a block of instruction on “Interviewing and Interrogation.”
However, these traditional systems stress the structured interview approach to interviewing.
The new trainee soon realizes that he or she will conduct hundreds or thousands of street interviews while on patrol and will perform relatively few formal, structured interviews in an interrogation room setting.
The beauty of the first responder interviewing training is its simplicity. There is no memorization of steps, rules, mandatory order of progression or confusing concepts.
Instead, in a series of articles, I will present a system where you decide how to approach the myriad of situations facing police officers in everyday life, using concepts which are based upon common sense.
There are some very fine formal “Interview and Interrogation” type training classes for law enforcement officers out there (being a polygraph examiner, I have attended quite a few of them), but they tend to emphasize the structured interrogation aspect of the situation and are geared more toward an investigator than a patrol officer.
The information I will deliver in this series of articles does not deal with just the structured interview/interrogation type setting. Again, an analysis of a patrol officer’s daily job reveals that the vast majority of contacts that he or she experiences are not in a structured setting conducive to a formalized method of interview and interrogation.
These techniques are being successfully used daily, are very easy to learn and do not require reference texts to be carried in the field.
In this system, we will look at what is wrong (or at least ineffective) with typical street interview techniques, what led us to use techniques that don’t work, what does work and how to develop techniques that will dramatically increase our “confession” or “incriminating statement” rates in dealing with offenders and will be of great value in clarifying statements obtained from victims and witnesses.
Yes, there will be some psychology and physiology presented, as both lay a foundation for the working mechanisms of this system. Although (I can hear your groans already) some basic psychological and physiological concepts are included so that you know why these concepts work, they are not necessary to learn to effectively use the procedures described herein.
Quite simply, the principles are included because some people like to know why something works, some people like to be shown how it works and some people won’t be convinced until they use the system personally.